4
354
by Your Lordship.
4.
a
There is, however,
a point connected with Mr. Horspool's appointment which I should be glad to be favoured with Your Lordship's decision, viz., whether Your Lordship intends that Mr. Horspool should, under the Police Ordinance No. 14 of 1887, continue to be a subordinate officer or not?
5.
Ordinance No. 9 of 1862 provided that there should be a Captain Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of Police, the latter not being included among the Subordinate Officers. This Ordinance was, with the exception of certain sections, repealed by Ordinance No. 14 of 1887, under which Ordinance there is no such Officer mentioned as an Assistant Superintendent. The three Superior...
¿
4
354
by Your Lordship.
4.
a
There is, however,
point connected with Mr
on
Horspool's appointment which I should be glad to be favoured
ed with Your Lordship's decision, viz., whether Your Lordship intends that Mr. Horspool should, under the Police
Ordinance W. 14 of 1887, continue to be a subordinate
or not?
Ordinance No.9 of
1862
officer
5.
1862 provided that there should be a Captain Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent
Police, the latter not
an
of
being included as
among
the
Subordinate
Officers.
This
Ordinance was, with the
exception of certain sections, repeated by Ordinance 1/4
of 1887, under which Ordinance there is no such Officer
mentioned as an Assistant
- Superintendent. The three Superior
ex
¿
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.